Ninth International Conference on Cold Fusion
(ICCF9) Meets in Beijing, China
Eugene F. Mallove
The first International Conference on Cold Fusion
of the twenty-first century (ICCF9) was held at Tsinghua University
in Beijing, China from May 19 through May 25, 2002. Conferees gathered
at the International Convention Center in the new, luxurious Uniscenter
Hotel. New experiments with irrefutable evidence for nuclear-scale
excess heat and nuclear products of low-energy nuclear reactions
(LENR) made this a good step forward. Nevertheless, the lack of
clear-cut evidence of progress toward near-term commercialization
of the real but elusive excess heat phenomenon was disappointing.
Still, it must be said that significant efforts to commercialize
this new energy source are occurring worldwide, a fact not evident
in the public discussions.
This ICCF9 report, prepared soon after returning from
China, is only a brief overview of the conference. More reports
may be published in future IE issues. Full technical papers will
be in the conference Proceedings, which will be available for purchase
from the ICCF9 website (http://iccf9.global.tsinghua.edu.cn).
ICCF9 was the first ICCF meeting to be held in China.
The last one, ICCF8, was held May 2000 in Lerici, Italy (see report
in IE #32). Two other ICCFs have been held in Asia: ICCF3 (1992)
and ICCF6 (1996), both in Japan. Following the traditional Europe-Asia-North
America rotation for ICCFs, ICCF10 will be held in the U.S., quite
possibly in the Cambridge/Boston area, but certainly on the eastern
seaboard. The chairman for ICCF10 is cold fusion theorist Prof.
Peter Hagelstein of MIT's Department of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science-hence the pull toward the Boston area. ICCF10 will
occur either in September or October 2003, because it was agreed
among members of the international organizing committee that a two-year
separation between ICCFs is too long.
ICCF9 was sponsored by: China's Fundamental Research
Division of the Ministry of Science and Technology; the Physics
Division II of the Natural Science Foundation of China; the Chinese
Nuclear Physics Society; and the Department of Physics at Tsinghua
University. It is gratifying to observe the open-mindedness of these
Chinese science organizations. Would that ICCF10 could be sponsored
by the U.S. DOE, NSF, the American Nuclear Society, and the MIT
Physics Department. But please don't hold your breath for that!
According to the ICCF9 Organizing Chairman, Professor
of Physics Xing Zhong Li of Tsinghua University, the conference
had 124 attendees, with 17 "accompanying persons." The
ICCF9 conference book contains 104 abstracts. The bulk of these
papers were presented in poster sessions on three different days,
with two to three minute oral summaries being given to the full
assembly of participants. Presentations that were deemed to merit
longer lectures to the whole group received 30 to 50 minute time
allotments. Some 77 of the attendees were from abroad, but the rest
were all from China, which appears to have an active interest in
cold fusion, dispersed among a variety of physics departments and
organizations. Known attendees and paper submissions (or abstracts)
came from Australia, Belarus, China, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece,
India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, Romania, Russia, Spain,
U.K., Ukraine, and the U.S.
Jed Rothwell provided this initial impression of ICCF9,
which seems appropriate: "These conferences are more difficult
to describe than they were a few years ago because experiments are
much more sophisticated. Results are no longer binary: heat or no
heat. Bare bones, basic repeatability is good in most experiments.
Results are usually multifaceted: heat plus charged particles plus
transmutations. When results are less than satisfactory, it is because
they vary over a wide range and do not correlate well with one another.
Expectations and standards are rising. A few years ago researchers
were pleased to see something happening in most runs. Now they want
to see the same thing happen to within an order of magnitude."
ICCF9 was similar to the other ICCFs since about ICCF6
in Toya, Japan-a mixed bag of very, very good material and experiments
(e.g. the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries report on repeatable transmutations-see
below), and lots of modest improvements, hints of progress here
and there, as well as some very marginal experiments. My overall
feeling about the cold fusion field is one of general sadness and
pessimism, tempered with glimmers of hope. Certainly, the reality
of these phenomena keep being re-emphasized with a widening circle
of experiments, but the field is generally unheralded and/or disrespected
worldwide. This was the first ICCF at which the infamous anti-cold
fusioneer, Dr. Douglas Morrison of CERN, was not present to assault
cold fusion researchers with ludicrous questions. Because of his
passing last year, there will be no absurd critiques circulated
to the outside world. This year, Robert Park of the APS was simply
silent about ICCF9-his cold fusion "informer" was no more.
Almost no one in the cold fusion field seems to have
a clue about what has to be done to energize the field-pardon the
pun. And there is even peculiar, inexplicable concealment of certain
advancements by some researchers. One example: Shortly before ICCF9,
reports of a new cold fusion method developed by a respected U.S.
researcher were circulating. It involves shining a low-power laser
onto a coated cathode in an electrochemical cold fusion cell in
calorimetric balance (no excess power). Remarkable, rapid increase
in output power of the cell occurs when the red laser light hits
an appropriate "active" spot on the cathode, or so it
is said. Moreover, the effect is very repeatable. Yet for reasons
that are not clear nor seemingly justified, no report of this work
was provided at ICCF9. With that episode as background, the end-of-conference
talk about "cooperation" and more rapid sharing of information
seemed like so much hogwash.
The only speaker who talked openly and directly about
an intent to commercialize was Dr. Les Case. His work, four years
beyond ICCF7 in Vancouver at which he announced his gas-phase "catalytic
fusion," has not yet emerged from the shadows. He spoke at
ICCF9 in expansive terms, and indeed he has launched a real new
and important area in cold fusion (possibly the most important direction),
but it is still unclear how far from his goal he remains.
We worked very, very hard here at New Energy Research
Lab (NERL) in Bow, New Hampshire to help Dr. Case use his big (100-liter
internal volume) dewar cell to verify excess heat and try to achieve
self-sustainment with his new proprietary formula-a patent-applied-for
catalyst very unlike earlier ones that were successfully tested
by him and others. Sorry to say, just after ICCF9 we came to this
conclusion about our initial Case work after performing a second
week-long series of runs with his catalyst: Almost no excess heat,
possibly at most a few watts out of approximately 100 watts input.
This is obviously far below self-sustaining, and it is possible
that some unconfirmed defect was present in these tests. For his
part, Dr. Case remains confident that various "know how"
items have not yet been properly integrated into these experiments,
because his own laboratory work with a smaller device evidences
great performance, he says. Nothing would make us happier than to
see our New Hampshire catalytic fusion colleague succeed brilliantly
by creating the self-sustaining reactor he believes to be just around
the corner. Other work on catalytic fusion, of a still confidential
nature, is proceeding elsewhere in the U.S., using Seebeck envelope
calorimetry of much smaller samples.
Conference organizer Prof. X.Z. Li's group at Tsinghua
University reported excess heat (at 2 watts/cc level) in a gas-loaded
system involving palladium wire in a deuterium atmosphere. Gas-phase
excess heat work of any kind bears a clear relation to what Case
is doing in catalytic fusion, so this paper was of special interest.
It speaks of a "pumping effect" of deuterium into palladium,
a phenomenon which will certainly merit scrutiny by others.
Some very good news that may help commercialization
efforts in the thin-film area: A group at Japan's Yokahama National
University led by Drs. Ota and Fujii tried ordinary water electrolytic
cells with thin-film-coated metal beads and tiny cylinders, similar
to Dr. James Patterson's thin-metal film-coated plastic beads, which
were so successful in the mid-1990s. (There are hints that cold
fusion work at CETI may be coming to life again. Stay tuned!) The
Yokahama group succeed in getting excess heat from about 25% of
its cells. The excess heat was not very high-about 50% excess at
maximum. Dr. Michael McKubre of SRI International had not been convinced
about the calorimetry of Patterson cells before ICCF9, but in his
summary toward the end of the conference he said that he was impressed
with the Yokahama work.
There were numerous papers confirming various kinds
of nuclear products-in Russia, China, and Japan. Prof. John Dash
and Dr. John Warner at Portland State University reported excess
heat results in the 10-25% excess range using titanium cathodes
in heavy water cells. They also found that trace amounts of gold
had formed during some runs, as detected by neutron activation analysis-a
Dr. Iwamura et al. at Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Advanced Technologies Center had the most spectacular work, which
will be reported in the Japanese Journal of Applied Physics later
this summer. They used a very expensive vacuum chamber with in-situ
XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectrometry) detection to observe the
transmutation of an atomic species; cesium and strontium were used
separately. The species is plated onto a palladium and CaO-layered
sandwich of material through which deuterium gas passes as it is
drawn through layers by vacuum on the other side. The upper surface
(facing the D2 gas) is 400 Ångstrom-thick pure Pd, followed
by a 1,000 Å multilayer sandwich of CaO and Pd. Then the bottom
layer, facing the vacuum, is 0.1 mm thick Pd. The upper D2 gas-facing
Pd layer has deposited on it the cesium (or strontium). Iwamura
et al. obtained a time-history of the transmutation phenomenon:
Cesium (Cs) transmutes to praseodymium (Pr), i.e. Cs-133 goes to
Pr-141. As the Cs declined, the Pr increased correspondingly.
The group hypothesizes that there is a gain by the
initial species of two alpha particles (two He-4) or a Be-8 nucleus!
The time-history of the growth of the new species matched the decline
of the old species. Contamination has been completely ruled out
by exhaustive testing. In the case of strontium, the reaction is:
Sr-88 goes to Mo-96. As detected by SIMS analysis, the molybdenum
isotope produced is Mo-96, highly anomalous with no possibility
of being naturally-occurring Mo. Overall, the Mitsubishi work is
as close to being a confirmation of what might be called "modern
alchemy" as can be imagined.
Italy, well-represented at ICCF9, has an official
cold fusion program which operates at several centers. Also, it
is known that the Pirelli Corporation at Milano has a working group
in cold fusion. The group of Dr. Antonella DeNinno et al. at ENEA
has apparently demonstrated massive excess heat in current-fed exploding
wires laid down on a substrate in a D2 gas atmosphere (this work
was initially presented at ICCF8). Cold fusion pioneer Dr. Martin
Fleischmann has concluded (told in private discussions) that this
group has demonstrated megawatts per cubic centimeter of power,
although the researchers claimed "only" 3-4 kilowatts
per cubic centimeter. In private remarks, Fleischmann continues
to be convinced that military authorities are now in on all of this
and looking toward the use of cold fusion processes in weapons.
Of great interest concerning the Italian program is
that physics Nobel laureate Carlo Rubbia has recently been quoted
in the Italian press to this effect: he believes that cold fusion
is real and important. Rubbia apparently was so eager to hear a
firsthand report from ICCF9 that he called several Italian scientists
home from the conference on the day before it ended. A delicious
emerging irony in this: a nemesis of cold fusion from its early
days, science journalist Gary Taubes, had written a book, Nobel
Dreams-a scathing personal attack on Rubbia's high-energy physics
work-this, long before cold fusion was announced. Rubbia may yet
get his revenge on Taubes! (A further aside: U.K. physics Nobel
laureate Brian Josephson continues to follow reports from the cold
fusion field with great interest, and is dismayed that mainstream
scientific publications are not paying attention to this work.)
We also learned at ICCF9 that a small cold fusion
group from Virginia has managed to secure a contract from the U.S.
Army for a cold fusion experiment. It is also known that DARPA (Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency) in the U.S. has provided limited
funding to a few high-profile cold fusion projects in academia (at
MIT, of all places!) and industry, but whether such funding continues
anywhere is not known. Dr. Edward Teller's associate, Dr. Lowell
Wood of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (a nuclear weapons
research facility), attended both ICCF7 and ICCF8. At the latter
conference, Dr. Wood seemed impressed with the quality of papers
and appeared convinced of the reality of the phenomenon.
A four person group from Israel attended ICCF9. It
was good to see interest from a country that perhaps more than any
other might benefit from the advent of the peaceful use of cold
Roger Stringham of sonofusion fame (First Gate Energies,
Inc.) has moved his laboratory to Hawaii from California. He gave
a talk at ICCF9, basically a review of his ultrasonic implantation
of deuterium into metals. He reiterated his findings of helium-4,
helium-3, and tritium in some of his earlier experiments.
Professor Yoshiaki Arata and Dr. Y.C. Zhang presented
research in the same general area in which Stringham works, which
is reported in two recent papers. Here are the abstracts:
"Intense Sono-implantation of Atoms from Gases
into Metals," Applied Physics Letters, 1 April 2002, Vol. 80,
No. 13, Yoshiaki Arata and Yue-Chang Zhang, Cooperation Research
Center for Science and Technology, Osaka University, 11-1 Mihogaoka,
Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan.
Abstract: It was found that various gaseous atoms
can be easily implanted into metal powders under ultrasonic cavitation
inside a vessel with water (H2O, D2O, or a mixture thereof). Inert
gases (3He, 4He, Ne, and Ar) and others (N2, air, H2, and D2) were
strongly sono-implanted into metals such as Ti, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zr,
Pd, Ag, Ta, Pt, and Au, which were originally set in the vessel
as foils, and were broken into ultrafine metal powders during intense
ultrasonic processing. A large amount of implanted atoms was verified
to exist in these powders from mass spectroscopic analyzes.
"Nuclear Fusion Reacted Inside Metals by Intense
Sono-implantation Effect," Proceedings of the Japan Academy,
Vol. 78, Ser. B, No. 3 (2002), Y. Arata, Y-C. Zhang.
Partial Abstract: "Using intense ultrasonic cavitation effect,
metals kept in heavy water were changed to nanometer-sized fine
powder and simultaneously condensed a large amount of deuterium
for 1 ~ 2 days. Mass analyzes of gases released from the revenant
metal powders revealed existence of 3He and 4He. . .excess energy
was recognized in only D2O working liquid. . ."
The work employs foils of Ti, Pd, Ag, Ta, Pt, and
Au from which nanometer-sized powders are created that are deuterium-loaded.
It was disappointing that Drs. Arata and Zhang did not acknowledge
Stringham's work, which certainly is related to theirs and preceded
it. This is but one small indicator of the mind-boggling fragmentation
that goes on in a field that is itself under attack from the outside.
I have told my cold fusion colleagues for years: "We're in
a life-raft together already. Nobody should be poking holes in the
One of the key concepts that has emerged prominently
at both ICCF8 and ICCF9 is that of flux of hydrogen (deuterium or
protium) into and through metals as a beneficial attribute for producing
LENR reactions. The term flux is to be considered in contrast to
the parameter of loading ratio (the ratio of hydrogen nuclei to
the number of metal lattice nuclei), which was much discussed in
past conferences as a necessary condition for excess heat production.
This important theoretical concept had been put forth long ago by
Dr. Mitchell R. Swartz, of Jet Energy Technology, Inc. of Massachusetts.1,2
At ICCF9, Dr. Swartz's work on optimal operating point excess heat
determination was highlighted when Prof. Hagelstein narrated a video
tape that Swartz had prepared for the APS meeting this past spring.
The Wednesday in the middle of the conference was
devoted to a sight-seeing and technology-related outing for the
conferees. We were transported via two large buses through some
horrible traffic jams in Beijing, and outward on free-flowing superhighways
toward the Great Wall of China (at Badaling). For a few hours we
all walked and climbed the awesome, ancient structure, which stretches
some 7,000 kilometers over mountaintops and into valleys across
China. It was a relaxing interlude.
The outing also featured a stop at the Beijing Ti-Gold
Great Wall Corporation, whose primary business is using ion-implantation
to coat decorative and architectural objects (metallic and non-metallic)
with a luscious film of gold overlaying titanium. The company also
sells ten models of ion-implanting machines and vacuum chambers.
The company was one of ICCF9's sponsors. President and owner of
the company, Prof. Wang Dian Ru, has taken the bold step of financing
a collaboration between his company and Tsinghua University on a
major cold fusion experiment. (To my knowledge, no such collaboration
on a cold fusion experiment exists in the United States.) Students,
graduate students, and one of Dr. X.Z. Li's post-doctoral associates
work on the project, which bears some relation to the earlier-described
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries experiment. A state-of-the-art IR camera
that peers through glass ports provides a measure of metal temperature
distribution caused by the deuterium that is made to penetrate palladium
and other metal substrates in the vacuum chamber.
The concluding day of the conference was largely devoted
to reviewing what ICCF9 had accomplished and "where to go from
here." The perennial discussion arose concerning the two-humped
distribution of numbers of cold fusion researchers plotted on a
graph against their ages. The bulk of researchers are, indeed, getting
on in years and by retirement, illness, or death will be disappearing-perhaps
before the hoped-for victory party at the humorously posited ICCF15.
So, how will the much smaller "hump" of younger researchers
be able to carry out all the work that must be done? How to get
more people involved in the field? Remarkably, not a peep was heard
during this multi-hour review about developing commercially available
demonstration units-or about cold fusion commercialization period!
I held back my frustration and did not speak to that point (as I
had at ICCF8), for fear of being impolite to the tired group of
One way to gain greater acceptance may be to form
a peer-reviewed journal for the field, because with Prof. George
Miley leaving as editor, Fusion Science (formerly Fusion Technology)
appears no longer to be allowing LENR papers among its hot fusion
pages. (Such papers are said by the new editor to be "not of
interest" to the readership.) Some bright news: Professor Peter
Hagelstein of MIT told us that he has been discussing with a major
science journal publication house the possible launch of a "Condensed
Matter Nuclear Physics" journal.
Professor A. Takahashi of Osaka University discussed
his experience in helping to found the Japan Cold Fusion Society.
There was discussion of whether cold fusion communities in other
countries should form similar national cold fusion societies, and
should there be an "International Cold Fusion Society."
The latter question went unresolved. Prof. Hagelstein
and Jed Rothwell are eager to have a more permanent web presence
for cold fusion, in the form of permanently posted archival papers
and notices. This will undoubtedly be launched before ICCF10. (Indeed,
just as this issue went to press we learned that a skeletal site,
www.LENR.org, has been posted.)
Final Thoughts: China
The struggle and ferment in the cold fusion field was exposed at
ICCF9 amid the backdrop of the great business turmoil and industrialization
now going on in China. This heretofore sleeping giant is clearly
in the process of waking up to new ways. This is evident in huge
billboards everywhere touting both Chinese and Western industries
in the computer, energy, and biotechnology fields. Though the People's
Republic of China may be a communist nation, capitalism is rampant
there. New enterprises are popping up everywhere on the streets
of Beijing-especially cell phone businesses. Many shops were lined
up on a single street, each selling cell phones! In one bookstore
I visited, a large number of items were Chinese translations of
popular business-culture "how to" books from the West.
Large numbers of bicycles and tricycle cargo-carrying vehicles were
everywhere, but Beijing has millions of cars and new buses too.
The infrastructure is being inexorably built up. It was very charming
to observe the bamboo construction scaffolding on high-rise buildings
in the works. Some ICCF9 attendees likened the atmosphere of China
in 2002 to Japan in the early 1970s.
Across from the very Westernized hotel in which the
conference was held, an entire city block of single-level masonry
buildings was leveled during the five-day conference! This to make
way for some new construction in the bustling Tsinghua University
area. The leveling was begun by dozens of workers with sledgehammers
and pick-axes, followed by only a single backhoe type machine. Most
of the debris was carefully recycled and taken away by dozens of
tricycle vehicles as well as numerous horse and donkey-drawn flat-bed
carriages. Even the old bricks were carefully packed in regular
arrays for recycling. Ditto for little pieces of scrap metal and
old, worn wire. It was simply amazing. Perhaps the cold fusion field
will trigger a similar and long-overdue leveling-a demolition-of
weak structures and obsolete paradigms in physics, even though most
cold fusioneers seem quite oblivious to this prospect.
1. Swartz, M.R. 1992. "Quasi-One-Dimensional Model of Electrochemical
Loading of Isotopic Fuel into a Metal," Fusion Technology,
Vol. 22, September, 296-300.
2. Swartz, M.R. 1994. "Isotopic Fuel Loading Coupled to Reactions
at an Electrode," Transactions of Fusion Technology, Vol. 26,